28 August 2009

Nancy Pelosi asks for $100K to fight 'smears' - I guess the truth has become a "smear" to Libeals

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has launched an urgent effort to raise $100,000 by Monday to help combat what she calls GOP "smears" about health care reform.

"Republican opponents of reform are coming out with one outrageous smear after the next, all aimed at derailing our progress. We must be able to counter their special interest-funded attacks and set the record straight," Pelosi wrote in a letter to Democratic supporters.

"That's why I have set a goal of raising $100,000 in grassroots donations before the August FEC fundraising deadline," says Pelosi.

Pelosi and Democrats are clearly worried that they've lost momentum on health care reform this month, and many in her caucus have been crushed by opposition at town hall events.

Pelosi's appeal is aimed at small donors, and she asks for donations of $5 or more in her letter.

Democrats for weeks have been on the defensive, accusing Republicans of mischaracterizing their reform effort. President Barack Obama fired back several weeks ago after Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a key Republican negotiator on the Senate Finance Committee, said the Democratic push threatened to "pull the plug on grandma."

Now, Pelosi is pushing back.

"Republicans are doing everything they can to spread the lies they hope will kill health insurance reform," Pelosi writes at the end of the e-mail. "Please make a generous financial contribution to help Democrats get the truth out and fight GOP smears."

Nothing like hypocrisy from the left to lighten up the day. I find it interesting that there have been more mistruths, misinformation, and downright deception from liberals and their allies than from their opponents and now they want $100k to fight GOP "smears." Yes, the GOP and conservatives want to kill the healthcare powergrab!!! It is not only most likely unconstitutional, but it goes against everything this country was founded on. Personal freedom and as little government interference as possible.

Posted via web from conservativedynamics's posterous

No comments: