17 October 2009

The Race Card, Football and Me - Limbaugh's response to the demigogery from the MSM and Liberals.

By RUSH LIMBAUGH

David Checketts, an investor and owner of sports teams, approached me in late May about investing in the St. Louis Rams football franchise. As a football fan, I was intrigued. I invited him to my home where we discussed it further. Even after informing him that some people might try to make an issue of my participation, Mr. Checketts said he didn't much care. I accepted his offer.

It didn't take long before my name was selectively leaked to the media as part of the Checketts investment group. Shortly thereafter, the media elicited comments from the likes of Al Sharpton. In 1998 Mr. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay $65,000 for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley case. He also played a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot (he called neighborhood Jews "diamond merchants") and 1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot.

Associated Press

Rush Limbaugh

Limbaugh

Limbaugh

Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson, whose history includes anti-Semitic speech (in 1984 he referred to Jews as "Hymies" and to New York City as "Hymietown" in a Washington Post interview) chimed in. He found me unfit to be associated with the NFL. I was too divisive and worse. I was accused of once supporting slavery and having praised Martin Luther King Jr.'s murderer, James Earl Ray.

Next came writers in the sports world, like the Washington Post's Michael Wilbon. He wrote this gem earlier this week: "I'm not going to try and give specific examples of things Limbaugh has said over the years because I screwed up already doing that, repeating a quote attributed to Limbaugh (about slavery) which he has told me he simply did not say and does not reflect his feelings. I take him at his word. . . . "

Mr. Wilbon wasn't alone. Numerous sportswriters, CNN, MSNBC, among others, falsely attributed to me statements I had never made. Their sources, as best I can tell, were Wikipedia and each other. But the Wikipedia post was based on a fabrication printed in a book that also lacked any citation to an actual source.

I never said I supported slavery and I never praised James Earl Ray. How sick would that be? Just as sick as those who would use such outrageous slanders against me or anyone else who never even thought such things. Mr. Wilbon refuses to take responsibility for his poison pen, writing instead that he will take my word that I did not make these statements; others, like Rick Sanchez of CNN, essentially used the same sleight-of-hand.

The sports media elicited comments from a handful of players, none of whom I can recall ever meeting. Among other things, at least one said he would never play for a team I was involved in given my racial views. My racial views? You mean, my belief in a colorblind society where every individual is treated as a precious human being without regard to his race? Where football players should earn as much as they can and keep as much as they can, regardless of race? Those controversial racial views?

The NFL players union boss, DeMaurice Smith, jumped in. A Washington criminal defense lawyer, Democratic Party supporter and Barack Obama donor, he sent a much publicized email to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that it was important for the league to reject discrimination and hatred.

When Mr. Goodell was asked about me, he suggested that my 2003 comment criticizing the media's coverage of Donovan McNabb—in which I said the media was cheerleading Mr. McNabb because they wanted a successful black quarterback—fell short of the NFL's "high standard." High standard? Half a decade later, the media would behave the same way about the presidential candidacy of Mr. Obama.

Having brought me into his group, Mr. Checketts now wanted a way out. He asked me to resign. I told him no way. I had done nothing wrong. I had not uttered the words these people were putting in my mouth. And I would not bow to their libels and pressure. He would have to drop me from the group. A few days later, he did.

As I explained on my radio show, this spectacle is bigger than I am on several levels. There is a contempt in the news business, including the sportswriter community, for conservatives that reflects the blind hatred espoused by Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson. "Racism" is too often their sledgehammer. And it is being used to try to keep citizens who don't share the left's agenda from participating in the full array of opportunities this nation otherwise affords each of us. It was on display many years ago in an effort to smear Clarence Thomas with racist stereotypes and keep him off the Supreme Court. More recently, it was employed against patriotic citizens who attended town-hall meetings and tea-party protests.

These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.

Mr. Limbaugh is a nationally syndicated talk radio host.

Limbaugh as usual is taking his detractors to task in a classy and logical way.

Posted via web from conservativedynamics's posterous

15 October 2009

Who is the greater threat to the Republican Party? Olympia Snowe/Lindsey Graham or Rush Limbaugh/ Glenn Beck?

If one listens to the mainstream media and the liberal wing of the Republican Party it is Limbaugh and Beck.  According to these people, Limbaugh and Beck are turning off voters to the Republican Party and driving them en masse to the Democratic Party because of their “inflammatory” and “out of step” rhetoric.  The cry is to move to the middle, expunge the party of “right-wing radicals” and become more like the Democratic Party.  The shrill coming from this group of progressives is that while the likes of Limbaugh and Beck, and their supporters, are a part of the Republican Party is in deep trouble and cannot win national elections because it is too far to the right.

What the mainstream media and the left wing of the Republican Party either don’t understand or are scared witless about is that commentators like Limbaugh and Beck speak to a large audience of like minded individuals.  What is also left out is that neither Limbaugh nor Beck pretend to speak for the party and that there are plenty of times that both hammer the Republican Party for acting like Democrats.  Some of those in Limbaugh and Beck’s audiences are Republicans, some are Libertarians, and some are Independents.  While there are differences of opinion, these audience members are all in agreement over one thing.  They don’t like the direction the country is headed.  These are generally intelligent individuals who understand the basics of history and have seen what socialistic policies have done to other countries and don’t want anything to do with them.  This group does its best to follow conservative principles and stick as close to the original intent and beliefs of the Founders as they can.  Many in this group are the core supporters of the Republican Party.  These are the ones who, at times, have to hold their noses and vote for the “moderate” Republican when their candidate of choice has either been beaten in the primaries or they cannot find a true conservative to run for the position.  These are the ones who contribute to campaigns.  These are the ones who want the Republican Party to stand on its principles rather than compromise them in hopes of some love from the media.  These are the ones who will make the difference in the 2010 midterm elections.

On the other side are Olympia Snowe, Lindsey Graham, and other moderate (code for liberal) Republicans.  These are the “Republicans” who spend more time hanging out with their Democratic colleagues than they do with their Republican counterparts.  They obviously do not subscribe to nor believe in the conservative values and principles that the Republican Party should.  These are the career politicians who will do and say anything to get re-elected regardless if that is the desire or in the best interest of their constituents.  (Thankfully Arlen Specter did the honorable thing and switched parties.)  This is also the group that believes that the Constitution is a living document and can be interpreted according to the current popular whim or twisted in order to justify the latest expansion of the Federal Government.  These are the ones who teamed up with the media and ridiculed the average voter and tea party attendee for being out of touch with reality or not smart enough to understand what is going on.  These are the ones who ridicule conservative values and hail liberal ones.  These are the ones who want to mirror the Republican Party with the Democratic Party.  These are the ones who consistently support a larger federal government intrusion into daily life and the economy.  These are the ones who believe that Europe is the one on the right path politically, not America.  None of this is what the Republican Party was founded on, nor is it what the Founding Fathers had in mind.

What the Republican Party needs is more people who uphold conservative values and view the vision of the Founding Fathers as the answer. It does not need those who believe that the failed policies of European socialism and becoming a clone of the Democratic Party are the answer as its elected representatives.  Far too long have Republican voters elected Republican candidates who are truly Republican in name only strictly because they were the lesser of two evils.  No longer should this be the choice the stakes are too high.  This is what is destroying the party and driving off voters not comments from the likes of Limbaugh and Beck. If Republican leadership doesn’t understand this, maybe it is time to replace them with someone who does.

On a personal level, look at both sides, listen closely to what they say, and see for yourself where the problem lies.  If you still believe that Limbaugh and Beck, as well as their supporters, are the problems with the Republican Party maybe they should look in the mirror and honestly ask if you truly believe in the conservative principles that the Republican Party should be upholding such as the original intent and beliefs of the Founding Fathers, minimal government intrusion into personal lives and the economy, and the smallest tax burden possible.  If so, welcome and please become part of the solution.  If not, then maybe the Democratic Party, and its big government big tax agenda, is better suited for you anyway. 

Posted via email from conservativedynamics's posterous

Obama loosens missile technology controls to China... Another example of Obama selling out to US enemies

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/15/inside-the-ring-2059116/#

Another example of Obama selling America down the river.  Why not open up all of our military inventory and capabilities to anyone who wants them.  Then we will be safe and loved by everyone.  NOT!!  It is times like this when I begin to wish Carter was back in office.  (Yes I am old enough to remember that bumbling idiot)

Posted via email from conservativedynamics's posterous

13 October 2009

Michelle Obama doll - Just like the real thing humorless and stiff!

Toymaker releases Michelle Obama doll to do battle in the shops with action figure of her husband

By Paul Thompson
Last updated at 6:46 PM on 13th October 2009

First Lady Michelle Obama is known for her toned arms and fashion sense.

So it was inevitable that an 'action figure' doll showing off her trademark bare arms would hit the market.

A US toymaker has released a 6in doll that is expected to be a big seller at Christmas - and outsell those of her husband.

Michelle Obama action doll
Michelle Obama

Go figure: The Michelle Obama doll comes in three different outfits, including the purple dress the First Lady wore on the day her husband Obama clinched the Democratic presidential nomination 

Jason Feinberg of Jailbreak Toys, who release the doll next month, said he expects the Michelle figure to be popular with girls.

White House officials have refused to comment on the dolls which will sell for $12.99 - or about �8.22

The Michelle figure comes with three outfits - each tailored to show off her bare arms.

The first has the figure in the purple dress worn when the Obama's shared their famous fist bump during the campaign.

Another has her dressed in the red and black dress she wore on Election Night and the final figure has Michelle in the black-and-white floral dress she wore during an appearance on US TV chat show 'The View.'  

On their website Jailbreak toys says the Michelle doll is a must have.

Michelle Obama action doll
Obama

A version of the doll comes in the black and red dress Mrs Obama wore on election night

It says: 'If there's one person in America who has captured the public's imagination even more than Barack Obama, it's his wife Michelle.

'So following the runaway success of the Obama Action Figure we simply had to make Michelle because Barack and Michelle are a team in the best and truest sense of the word and you can't have one without the other.

Action man: Over 200,000 Barack Obama dolls have been sold since

Action man: Over 200,000 Barack Obama dolls have been sold since last year

'Just like in real life, the Michelle Obama Action Figure isn't simply be a female counterpart to Barack. She's her own lady with her own style and energy and, of course, her own fashion sense. 

Feinberg said his target audience for the new doll is not children but adults 'who collected toys as a child, who haven't lost that kind of whimsical enthusiasm.'

The toymaker said he came up with the idea of the First Lady doll six months ago in response to the popularity of Mrs Obama.

He said: 'The entire political scene was a little rosier at the time  But what was really apparent was the country, and really the world at large, were very enamoured of this lady.' 

He said the Barack Obama action figure had sold over 200,000 since being launched in 2008.

Feinberg admitted President Obama's image was that of a super hero while his wife's was more 'classy'.

Earlier this year the White House objected to toy dolls based on the Obama's children, Sasha and Malia.

The makers of Beanie Babies launched two dolls called Marvellous Malia and Sweet Sasha soon after the January Inauguration.

But the White House condemned the release with a spokesman saying: 'We feel it is inappropriate to use young private citizens for marketing purposes.' 

Explore more:

People:
,
Places:
Organisations:

Share this article:

Add your comments

Comments (4)

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

This just proves how the White House is a laughing stock. Dolls being made after first wives. The Olympics with Oprah And the Nobel Prize for being a president? There are more deserving people , I am ashamed.

- w. dix, phila pa, 13/10/2009 18:57

Click to rate     Rating   52

Report abuse

What an amazing likeness! Wouldn't buy it, but good for a laugh.

- LM, Hamilton, Canada, 13/10/2009 18:56

Click to rate     Rating   76

Report abuse

Maybe she should have a nobel cringe prize.?

- Mickey, Newcastle uk, 13/10/2009 18:46

Click to rate     Rating   45

Report abuse

I'll place some of those dolls in my flowerbeds, her scary likeness is bound to scare away the cats that mess in my garden.

Awful woman, awful doll.

- jojo, Swansea, 13/10/2009 18:43

Click to rate     Rating   20

Report abuse

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Add your comment

Ads By Google

Barack Obama Video JokesWatch Jokes made of Barack Obama.Free Political Video Toolbar.Videos.alot.com
$300/Hr ABC Home JobWork Online With ABC From Home.Guaranteed Work. Start Today.consumerwatchdogradio.org
American Girl� Bitty BabyBitty Baby from American Girl--Bring Your Baby Home Today!www.AmericanGirl.com

And the Obama cult of personality goes on. Too bad these people hate capitalism so much, they might make some money off the Obama mush heads. Oh wait, apparently capitalism is okay for them. Just ask Michael Moore the waling garbage compactor.

Posted via web from conservativedynamics's posterous

Forget the Taliban! White House Escalates War of Words With Fox News.

Home

White House Escalates War of Words With Fox News

Anita Dunn, White House communications director, calls Fox News a "wing of the Republican Party," after the White House began using its government blog to criticize "Fox lies." 

FOXNews.com

Monday, October 12, 2009

White House communications director Anita Dunn, shown here, says FOX News is a Republican Party \\

"Going after a news organization, in my experience, is always a loser," Blankley said on CNN. "They have a big audience. And Fox has an audience of not just conservatives -- they've got liberals and moderates who watch too. They've got Obama supporters who are watching. So it's a temptation for a politician, but it needs to be resisted." 

Nia Malika Henderson, White House correspondent for the Politico newspaper, also questioned the White House offensive against Fox. 

"Obama's only been a boon to their ratings and I don't understand how this kind of escalation of rhetoric and kind of taking them on, one on one, would do anything other than escalate their ratings even more," she said. 

Dunn used an appearance on CNN's "Reliable Sources" over the weekend to complain about Fox News' coverage of the Obama presidential campaign a year ago. 

"It was a time this country was in two wars," she recalled. "We'd had a financial collapse probably more significant than any financial collapse since the Great Depression. If you were a Fox News viewer in the fall election, what you would have seen would have been that the biggest stories and biggest threats facing America were a guy named Bill Ayers and something called ACORN." 

Ayers was co-founder of the Weather Underground, a communist terrorist group that bombed the Pentagon and other buildings in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1995, Ayers hosted Obama at his home for a political function and the two men later served together on the board of an anti-poverty group known as the Woods Fund. 

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), which once had close ties to Obama, has been accused by a variety of law enforcement agencies of voter fraud. In recent weeks, the Democrat-controlled Congress moved to sever funding to ACORN after Fox News aired undercover videotapes of ACORN employees giving advice on how to break the law to a pair of journalists disguised as a pimp and prostitute. 

As for Dunn's complaint about Fox News' coverage of the Obama campaign, a study by the Pew Research Center showed that 40 percent of Fox News stories on Obama in the last six weeks of the campaign were negative. Similarly, 40 percent of Fox News' stories on Obama's Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, were negative. 

On CNN, by contrast, there was a 22-point disparity in the percentage of negative stories on Obama (39 percent) and McCain (61 percent). The disparity was even greater at MSNBC, according to Pew, where just 14 percent of Obama stories were negative, compared to a whopping 73 percent of McCain stories -- a spread of 59 points. 

Although Dunn accused Fox News of being a "wing of the Republican Party," she said the network does not champion conservatism. 

"It's not ideological," she acknowledged. "I mean, obviously, there are many commentators who are conservative, liberal, centrist -- and everybody understands that." 

Still, Obama refused to appear on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace on Sept. 20, the day he appeared on five other Sunday shows. At the time, the White House characterized the snub as payback for the Fox Broadcast Network's decision not to air an Obama prime time appearance. But last weekend, Dunn blamed Fox News Channel's coverage of the administration for Obama's snub of Fox News Sunday. 

"Is this why he did not appear?" Dunn said. "The answer is yes." 

Wallace has called White House officials "the biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington." 

Dunn was asked by CNN's Howard Kurtz whether Obama would grant an interview to Fox News by the end of the year. 

"Obviously, he'll go on Fox, because he engages with ideological opponents and he has done that before, he will do it again," Dunn replied. "I can't give you a date, because frankly I can't give you dates for anybody else right now." 

But last week, Fox News was informed by the White House that Obama would grant no interviews to the channel until at least 2010. The edict was relayed to Fox News by a White House official after Dunn discussed the channel at a meeting with presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs and other Obama advisers. 

"What I will say is that when he (Obama) goes on Fox, he understands he's not going on it really as a news network, at this point," Dunn said on CNN. "He's going on to debate the opposition. And that's fine. He never minds doing that." 

Dunn also strongly implied that Fox had failed to follow up on a New York Times story about a scandal swirling around GOP Sen. John Ensign of Nevada, although Fox News broadcast the stories on numerous shows, including Special Report with Bret Baier. 

Clemente questioned the motives of the White House attack, which comes in the wake of an informal coffee last month between Fox chairman Roger Ailes and Obama adviser David Axelrod. 

"Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and Fox News is the target of their attack mentality," he said. "Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about." 

Blankley suggested the war on Fox News is unpresidential. 

"It lowers the prestige," he said. "If you're president or speaker, at a certain level, you don't want to be seen to be engaging that kind of petty bickering. If you're just a congressman, maybe you can do it." 

In an interview over the summer, Obama made clear that Fox News has gotten under his skin. 

"I've got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration," he told CNBC's John Harwood. "You'd be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front." 

At the White House Correspondents Dinner in May, Obama even mocked the media for supporting him. 

"Most of you covered me; all of you voted for me," Obama said, spurring laughter and applause from the assembled journalists. "Apologies to the Fox table." 

Gergen said the White House should delegate its attacks to outside support groups. 

"Why don't they take this over to the DNC, over to the Democratic National Committee, and have their struggles like that fought out over there and not out of the White House?" Gergen said. "I have real questions about that strategy." 

Click here for more on the conflict between the White House and Fox News. 

If FOX News is a wing of the Republican Party, then CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, and PBS are the media czars of the Obama Administration.

Posted via web from conservativedynamics's posterous